On the Philippine Constitution’s mandate for separation of Church and State and the emergence of an Islamic nation within the country


SeparationOfChurch&State-USEArticle II, Section 6 of the Philippine Constitution provides: “The separation of the Church and State shall be inviolable.” The mandate – which must never to be broken, infringed, or dishonored – is the most violated law of the land. There is no separation of church and state in the Philippines – the country is in fact a Christian religious state.

To make matters worse, a bill pending in the Philippine congress proposes the creation of an autonomous region to be known as Bangsamoro. The proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law (BBL) aims to settle armed rebellions by Muslim groups in the country’s south. If the bill becomes law, Bangsamoro will be an Islamic autonomous nation within a Christian state. And worse yet to come, the autonomous Bangsamoro region could later evolve into a fully sovereign nation for reasons of its being incompatible with a Christian state.

Let’s look at a few facts about religion and government in the Philippines:

  1. Politicians and political parties publicly compete for the endorsement and support of churches and religious organizations.
  2. Church leaders mobilize their flocks for political and other civic actions via their church sermons and public rallies.
  3. Church leaders make public statements denouncing or supporting certain government acts and activities.
  4. Priests and other church officials appear at state-sponsored activities and functions wearing their religious vestments.
  5. Because of church influence and pressure, the Philippines is the only country in the world outside of the Vatican that does not allow married couples to divorce. The Roman Catholic Church in the Philippines grants “legal separation” to married couples – but a legally-separated person cannot remarry.
  6. Neither the Roman Catholic nor the Iglesia Ni Cristo church displays the Philippine flag at their premises.
  7. Church leaders publicly reprimand, admonish, condemn and/or approve, commend or acclaim Philippine government officials for certain of their official actions or stances.
  8. Religion is taught in public schools where public school premises and equipment are used for such teaching in violation of Article III, Section 5 and Article VI, Section 29 of the Constitution.
  9. The Philippine government has no policy or program in place to enable the assimilation of the country’s Muslim population.

Churches and other religious institutions in the Philippines are required by law to register with the country’s Securities and Exchange Commission to which they could apply for tax-exempt status, and to which they are required to file annual financial statements. The Roman Catholic and Iglesia Ni Cristo churches turn a blind eye to these requirements.

To make things right, the Philippines should either repeal – or convincingly and credibly enforce – its Constitutional mandate for the separation of the Church and State.

Advertisements

About Julius Willis

A former Philippines newspaperman and businessman, Julius resettled in California, USA, where he simultaneously worked as an instructional and technical writer and engineering department manager and taught college for 26 years. Now retired, he serves as a member of the City of Hayward's Planning Commission, the Alameda County Housing & Community Development Advisory Committee, and the Advisory Board of CSU-East Bay's Center For Filipino Studies. He is also on Hayward's General Plan Task Force.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to On the Philippine Constitution’s mandate for separation of Church and State and the emergence of an Islamic nation within the country

  1. A Quote from the late President John F. Kennedy:
    “. . . It is apparently necessary for me to state once again – not what kind of church I believe in, for that should be important only to me – but what kind of America I believe in.
    “I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute; where no Catholic prelate would tell the President — should he be Catholic — how to act, and no Protestant minister would tell his parishioners for whom to vote; where no church or church school is granted any public funds or political preference, and where no man is denied public office merely because his religion differs from the President who might appoint him, or the people who might elect him . . .
    “. . . where no religious body seeks to impose its will directly or indirectly upon the general populace or the public acts of its officials . . .”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s