Harry Stonehill: enterprise helped him build a business empire, recklessness and lack of political finesse brought it all down


HarryStonehill-150I remember Harry S. Stonehill. In his final months as a powerful and sometimes feared businessman in the Philippines, I would meet with him at his Magsaysay Building office in Ermita where we plotted PR campaigns aimed at curbing the wave of bad press that threatened his very being. Then-Manila-mayor Arsenio H. Lacson complained to me at one time that Stonehill was “crowding me out of the front pages.”

Harry S. Stonehill came to Manila in 1945 as a lieutenant in the US Army. He used his rank and authority to sell four to five dozen US army trucks and a military fuel barge, pocketing about $70K in cash. Harry fell in love with the country and its people, especially noting that he could “get away with murder” being an American and that Filipinos can be “bought.” After his military discharge, Harry returned to the US to persuade his wife to join him and start a new life in the Philippines; she turned him down. With a heavy heart, Harry returned to the Philippines, and, using the $70K he made earlier, started his new life. He divorced his American wife and married a member of a prominent Filipino family.

Harry started his Philippine adventure with partner Ira Blaustein (a discharged US Army sergeant). They organized the Universal Trading Company, a retailer of home appliances (they would purchase the appliances from US Army post exchanges). Later, with partner Robert P. Brooks, he established the US Tobacco Corporation, the firm that manufactured the cheap and very popular “Puppies” brand cigarettes. It was US Tobacco profits that gave Harry the leverage to expand his empire, initially into all areas of the tobacco industry.

By 1962 – seventeen years after he first set foot in Manila – Harry S. Stonehill had a business empire worth $50 million, a terribly huge fortune in those times. But 1962 was also the year Harry S. Stonehill wished he could undo a lot of things he’d done to save his good position in his adopted society and – most especially – his hard-earned fortune.

Stonehill’s empire consisted of about a dozen enterprises that included cigarettes, glass, cement, oil, textile, housing, and the huge and controversial Manila Bay reclamation project. He was the talk of the town. He lived in the exclusive Forbes Park district in Makati. But Harry had a bad side and associated himself with some pretty shady people.

Harry Stonehill was a tough man to work with. While his front office was staffed by the prettiest, most cordial and best-dressed young ladies you could find in Manila, the Stonehill back offices were “knock-down, drag-out” dens where wheeling and dealing took place – and where one could often hear his voice raised in anger, spewing invectives. Harry was pretty mean with his executive staff.

Harry sometimes listened to his staff and their ideas, but he mostly dictated. One of his dictates was the importation of 10 million kilos of high-grade Virginia tobacco. That deal gave him a monopoly of the raw tobacco supply in the country – every other cigarette maker, including top US brands, had to buy tobacco from him. He had all his competition by their “short and curlies” he would brag.

With the tobacco import, Harry also brought into the country Virginia tobacco seeds which he distributed free to farmers in Northern Luzon. He trained Ilocano farmers how to plant, cultivate, reap and cure tobacco leaves – and promised to buy all they produced at very handsome prices. And that was what caused his downfall: it was against federal law to export high-grade Virginia tobacco seeds from the US. The US government subsidized US tobacco farmers. The US tobacco industry wanted Stonehill prosecuted for his “treasonous” act – and the FBI went to work. The FBI wanted Stonehill flushed out of the Philippines.

MeinhartSpielman-150Meinhart Spielman – Harry’s manager for the US Tobacco Corporation – started to spill the beans on Harry. Stonehill had earlier fired Spielman for insubordination and for dipping into US Tobacco coffers. Spielman offered to collaborate with the FBI and Philippine government investigators. Spielman was reportedly tricked into trying to leave the country via the island of Sulu in the southern Philippines where he allegedly was to take a boat out of the country but ended up being dumped into the sea. Another account has it that Spielman found his way to Canada where he resided in an assisted-living facility before passing away.

Because he had bribed almost every Philippine public official – including members of congress and the executive branch – the FBI found Harry Stonehill hard to get, except for one little hole. That little hole was the upright Jose Wright Diokno, the then-Philippine Secretary of Justice.

JoseWDiokno-150Secretary Diokno placed all kinds of pressure and obstacles in Harry’s way, making the American commit more blunders. Members of congress and other government officials whom he had bribed and who were supposedly “under his control” soon started abandoning their benefactor. Harry became the subject of congressional probes. Then-president Diosdado Macapagal distanced himself from Harry. Nothing was more fearful to a Philippine public servant than an FBI operation. The Philippine government charged Harry with bribery, influence peddling and – ironically – economic sabotage.

Stonehill and partner Robert Brooks were arrested on multiple charges on March 3, 1962 and ordered deported five months later (on August 3) after the government failed to convict them of anything. Having no other country to settle in, the two finally ended up in the US where they were charged with tax evasion, illegal currency exportation, and economic sabotage, among other crimes. [Read: The US Case versus Harry S. Stonehill and Robert Brooks.]

With his Filipino wife (nee Lourdes Blanco) and four children, Harry wandered from country to country. Every country he visited and stayed in – including Japan, England, Brazil, and Switzerland – would eventually order him expelled. He and his family finally settled in Spain where he died in 2002 at the age of 84.

A sad footnote to Harry’s legacy is that he visited the Philippines in 1987 – he wanted to recover properties that had been taken over by (in his words) “a horde of opportunistic people” that included some of his former executives.

His PR campaign fell flat. That is how I remember Harry.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Options for Filipinos in their 2016 elections: more good government or the validation of corrupt political dynasties


RoxasBinayPoeDuterte-2016-530The Philippines and the Filipino people are at a crossroads of their political destiny. Their 2016 elections offer the Filipino people an opportunity to continue a program of rebuilding a political system patterned after the US government and purging it of corrupt family dynasties or – please forbid – to validate corruption and the propagation of political dynasties. The task of choosing between good and evil will be trying because for many Filipinos entitlement and favor are ways of life – many Filipinos consider it acceptable and just for a person to reap benefits from public office in spite of laws that prohibit and punish bribery, graft, and corruption.

The two paths at the crossroads are two political parties and their candidates for president. On one path is Mar Roxas who represents good government and who is the official candidate of the Liberal Party (LP). On the other path is Jejomar Binay, who represents family dynasties and epitomizes corruption, and who is the official candidate of the United Nationalist Alliance (UNA). Roxas is the country’s current Secretary of the Interior and Local Government while Binay is the country’s sitting vice president.

The Liberal Party’s platform carries incumbent president Benigno S. Aquino III’s “Straight Path” (Daang Tuwid) program that promises transparency, accountability and fairness in government. The United Nationalist Alliance believes in a totalitarian government where absolute power is used to feed the people palliatives while government officials rob them blind.

The Liberal Party is for continuing good relationships with the Western world, especially the US, while UNA – as Binay has often declared – will move closer toward its Asian neighbors and a dictatorship of the elite. (It will be noted that Vice President Binay and his son Makati City mayor JunJun Binay have been charged with the crime of plunder by the Philippine Office of the Ombudsman. The vice president’s wife Elenita was a Makati City mayor while his two daughters, Abigail and Nancy, are a congresswoman and a senator, respectively.)

By his own utterances, if Binay is elected president he will work toward entrenching his self in power just like Ferdinand Marcos tried to. More ominously, Binay will make sure his family members are in positions of power – a move that will protect and preserve his entrenchment (all three children – JunJun, Nancy and Abigail – currently hold powerful government positions). Under a Binay presidency graft and corruption will be rampant – and before one knows it the country will end up under a family dictatorship. Vice President Binay himself has said a dictatorship is what the country needs.

A Mar Roxas election will mean the government continues the current administration’s program – completing the move toward good government, the eradication of graft and corruption, and the elimination of family political dynasties. Additionally, a Roxas victory will see hundreds of plunderers placed behind bars as the country’s Office of the Ombudsman pursues its anti-graft campaign.

The crossroads may get complicated a bit with the addition of third-party candidates such as Senator Grace Poe and Davao City mayor Rodrigo Duterte. If any or both of them decide to put up a candidacy (the odds are slim that they will) and make a determined run for it, the people’s choice will still be one between Roxas and Binay – between good and evil.

And it should be an easy choice. For who is the Filipino that will allow his country to go down the drain and into a regime of dictatorship, graft and corruption?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The ‘Imperial’ – and why the United States is way behind in fully implementing the International System of Units


Metric&EnglishMeasurementStandard-530In 1981 and early 1982, I would describe the metric system of measurements to my electronics and computer science students and tell them why it was better than the Imperial or English standard that was then in use. Our classrooms were newly equipped with 24-hour clocks. Around the nation, freeway and other road signs noted distances in Kms and speed limits in Kms/h; gasoline station pumps displayed Liters for quantities bought. The country was undergoing a change – for the better.

But before 1982 came to an end, alas! The classroom clocks were replaced with old 12-hour timepieces. Signs along the freeways reverted back to indicate miles, and gas station pumps once more served gallons instead of liters of fuel. Americans who travel abroad had to remember how to convert Celsius to Fahrenheit just so they would know whether to feel warm or cold.

What happened and why?

Politicians warmed up to big businesses – notably the American automobile and tool-making industries. Converting to metric would have been a costly re-tooling disaster. We’re pure English today as far as tools are concerned. American-made tools like screwdrivers and wrenches are useless in much of the rest of the world. [Only two countries in today’s world are officially non-metric: Liberia and Myanmar (Burma). As I will show later, the US is officially a metric country, contrary to what some pundits believe.]

Is the US totally non-metric? Somewhat – or not quite. The United States does not formally conduct business using the metric system, but it is a metric-system nation. Aside from the fact that the US congress had enacted a Metric Conversion law, the US uses the metric system in electronics, food products (including nutrition information labeling), and sporting activities (except American football). But for many other things, like land measurement, the country stalls: how much land area makes an acre?

Why is there so much opposition to going completely metric? Why do our school children have to memorize things like “16 ounces make a pound, 12 inches make a foot, and 3 feet make a yard” when school kids in just about the rest of the world have it easy?

Politicians and big businesses blame the American people for the country not being fully metric. They allege that Americans are used to measuring things by what they do and can do – like an acre is how much land one can plow in one day! Silly nonsense! If you leave it up to the people to decide, yes, they will not want change. The reason we have leaders and big business and government is so we could have rules and systems put in place that would be good for us – the people.

Here are the facts. The US Congress authorized the use of the metric system in 1866 and in 1876 the US signed the international “Treaty of the Meter.” In 1960 the Treaty of the Meter was updated and became known as the SI (its French acronym) or the International System of Units. In 1975 the US Congress enacted the Metric Conversion Law which declared metric as the preferred system and with it created the US Metric Board. The 17-member Metric Board was to implement the conversion of the US to a nation of metric systems.

In the early 1980s, under Jimmy Carter’s presidency, the US started setting up road signs and speed limits in kilometers and Km/h and American-made motor vehicles had speedometers that included Km/h indicators. But then in 1982 – the doom year for the full implementation of the metric system in the US – President Ronald Reagan disbanded the 17-member US Metric Board in a budget-cutting initiative. And that’s how we got to where we are today. President Reagan’s act makes the US an officially metric country that has no program to implement metrication.

Will the US ever go completely metric? The answer is YES! New technologies, the compulsions of international trade, and our ever-creative people will eventually force the complete and permanent use of the metric system.

Except maybe for American football.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Three of the Philippines’ most corrupt political leaders rank among the top 10 in the world


MARCOS-ESTRADA-BINDAY-500Why do Filipinos – the great majority of them economically handicapped and socially disadvantaged – allow corrupt public officials to get away with their crimes and, in most cases, reelect or elevate them to higher public office?

Two of the 10 most corrupt leaders in the world are former Philippine presidents who continue to be admired and respected and whose families continue to occupy high and powerful public office. A sitting vice president has already joined the ranks of the two while actively and callously campaigning to be the next president of the country.

Filipinos are predisposed to dismiss corruption allegations as “envy” and consider the amassment of ill-gotten wealth as a right and a privilege for those who have worked their way up the ladder to power (and infamy). Filipinos are prone to adore families that enrich – and then entrench themselves – in public office.

Who are the three Filipino public servants who rank among the World’s 10 Most Corrupt? The Philippine press names them as former presidents Ferdinand Marcos and Joseph Estrada, and incumbent vice president Jejomar “Jojo” Binay. The three are in good company: the other seven – in no order of importance – are Arnoldo Aleman (the 81st president of Nicaragua), Alberto Fujimori (the 90th president of Peru), Jean-Claude Duvalier (the 33rd president of Haiti), Slobodan Milosevic (the third president of Serbia/Yoguslavia), Sani Abacha (the tenth president of Nigeria), Mobuto Sese Seko (the second president of Congo), and Mohamed Suharto (the second president of Indonesia). Vice president Binay has the distinction of being ranked among the world’s ten most corrupt while only a vice president.

Here’s a look at why the Philippine press ranks each of the three among the world’s top ten:

  1. Ferdinand Edralin Marcos (born 1917, died 1989). The tenth president of the Philippines (1965-1986) started out with noble motives and great deeds for his country and people. Because of his authoritarian bent, he eventually harbored the idea of being president for life – planting the seeds that allowed him to declare martial law toward the end of his second term while his wife and members of her family robbed the country’s treasury and stashed an astounding $10-billion or more in bank accounts around the world. Much – but not all – of the loot has since been returned by the Swiss and other governments to the Philippine treasury. Meanwhile, Marcos’ wife Imelda is a member of the country’s House of Representatives and son Ferdinand Jr. is governor of their home province, Ilocos Norte.
  2. Joseph Ejercito Estrada (real name: Jose Marcelo Ejercito). While in office, the 13th (foreboding?) president of the Philippines (1988-2001) was accused and convicted of plunder (involving PhP78-PhP80 million in “forged” funds) but was granted an “absolute” pardon by succeeding Philippine president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The absolute pardon erases the crime and its effects. Because of the pardon, he was able to run again – unsuccessfully – for president. He is currently the elected mayor of the city of Manila. His son Jinggoy, a member of the Philippine senate, is in jail on nonbailable plunder charges.
  3. Jejomar “Jojo” Binay. Accused of being corrupt since 1988 when he was mayor of the city of Makati, Binay is said to have amassed at least PhP100 million worth of real property and investments in the city and elsewhere during the 12 years he was mayor. Under investigation by the Philippine senate’s Blue Ribbon Committee and having been charged with the crime of plunder at the Office of the Ombudsman, the now vice president has consistently brushed aside the accusations as “a political demolition job” aimed at stalling his drive to be president of the country. In addition, he is said to own a 66-hectare farm and ranch in Batangas province that could easily be the envy of the English royal family. Binay’s son, current suspended Makati mayor Jejomar “Junjun” Binay, has also been charged with the crime of plunder before the Philippines’ Office of the Ombudsman. The vice president’s wife Elenita was a former Makati city mayor and his two daughters Nancy and Abigail are members of the Philippines Senate and House of Representatives, respectively.

Just for the record, the Philippines press is one of the freest in the world and the country’s prosecutorial and judicial systems are among the world’s most incorruptible.

Posted in Uncategorized | 55 Comments

Since Jews, Christians, and Muslims worship the same God why don’t they get along and leave their differences to God?


JudaismChristianityIslam-Icons-550Most of the world’s conflicts stem from the differences in doctrine and unnecessary intolerance between Jews, Christians, and Muslims. Each of the three religions would wish the others did not exist. Muslims themselves have been killing each other – Sunni and Shia appear to be on a path of completely destroying one another. Muslims and Jews are unable to live side-by-side in peace and are constantly threatening to eliminate one another from the face of the earth. Some Muslim sects preach the annihilation of all people that do not subscribe to their faith. And count in about 200 years of Catholic Church “crusades” against Muslims – and, by some accounts – Jews.

What seems to be the problem? Don’t Christians, Muslims, and Jews worship the same deity, the same God? The fact is that Christians, Muslims, and Jews base their faiths on one and the same person – Abraham.

Judaism teaches that God selected a nomad, Abraham, to father a nation that God created and set up as an example to other nations; thus, to Jews, the Prophet Abraham is the father of all Jewish people. Christians believe that the Prophet Abraham is a descendant of God – and Jesus is a descendant of Abraham. To Muslims, Ibrahim (Abraham) is a friend of God, the father of prophets, and the ancestor of the Prophet Muhammad. All three religions have Abraham (or Ibrahim) – and all his relations – as their link to one and the same God.

While Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have different roles for Abraham in the scheme of things, they nevertheless hold themselves loyal to one and the same God and must naturally believe that God wants ALL his people to live in peace and harmony. Former President George W. Bush put it succinctly during a post-9/11 interview with Al Arabiya TV: “I believe there is a universal God. I believe the God that the Muslim prays to is the same God that I pray to. After all, we all came from Abraham. I believe in that universality.” And in a speech to Muslims in Morocco in 1985, Pope John Paul II said “We believe in the same God, the one God, the living God, the God who created the world and brings his creatures to their perfection.”

So why don’t Jews, Christians, and Muslims agree to live in peace with each other, tolerate each other’s differences, and leave the rest to God?

I honestly believe that God himself would want that question answered.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Doesn’t HAMAS realize they’re being used as tools by their “friends”?


IsraeliSoldiersMoveIntoGazaWhen they’re gifted with rockets by Iran and money by Qatar to build tunnels into Israel and told to launch those rockets and use the tunnels to commit terrorist incursions, does HAMAS not realize they’re being used as pawns by folk who have an axe to grind against the Jewish state?

Acquiring rockets and building tunnels are not the kinds of actions a prospective nation would engage in – especially against a powerful country like Israel. People seeking world sympathy in their quest for nationhood do not threaten and commit terrorist acts against a neighbor.

There must be something wrong with the thinking among HAMAS’ leadership. Firing rockets into Israel and using tunnels to commit terrorist incursions only set them back a few decades in their quest for nationhood.

HAMAS defies logic!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

No, sir, Daniel Cadet – we don’t need people like Donald Sterling or Cliven Bundy


Sterling&Bundy-250Daniel Cadet, editor of Black Voices at Huffington Post, wrote (read his piece) that the world needs people like Donald Sterling and Cliven Bundy because “they make white people feel safe . . . white people can look at them and say ‘I’m not a racist because I’m not like that’.” He adds that folk like Sterling and Bundy “give black people gratification because black people can point to them and say ‘And you white people think we live in a post-racial society’.” Cadet concludes that Sterling and Bundy “restore world order around America’s idea of what racism is supposed to look like. . . . After being confronted by these sort of ‘monsters’ we can all come together, fight them down and ultimately proclaim that we are one.”

POPPYCOCK!

Cadet’s assertion is akin to saying the world needs murderers and rapists, because without murderers and rapists you and I would not be able to proclaim: “I’m not a murderer” or “I’m not a rapist.” What we need more in this world are the real boogie men: good thinkers and good writers.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Georgia goes wild: state passes law allowing concealed weapons almost everywhere


ConcealedWeapon-250You have reason now to fear more for your life after July 1, 2014 if you live in the state of Georgia: Gov. Nathan Deal has signed into law a bill that allows licensed gun owners in Georgia and visitors from 28 other states to bring a gun into a bar without restrictions and to carry a firearm into government buildings that don’t have security measures in place. The new law also allows concealed weapons to be carried into churches, school zones, and certain parts of airports. The law goes into effect July 1, 2014.

Gov. Deal called the passage of the law a “great day to reaffirm our liberties,” saying Georgia residents can now “protect their families.” We cannot argue against the fact that most Georgians will now need guns to protect themselves, albeit from they themselves.

We can only wonder what the TSA, which is responsible for security at Atlanta’s international airport – the world’s busiest – have to say about the new Georgia law. The same can be said of people responsible for security at government office buildings, churches, schools, and even bars.

It should be pretty clear that the new Georgia law will make it easier for the criminally inclined to enter populated places with concealed weapons.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Nothing but a spoiled brat: the chance to role model and serve society is gone to waste as Justin Bieber is carried away by bad influences


JustinBieber-250-NEWAdored by multitudes of fans, Justin Bieber was on his way to becoming not just one of the world’s greatest entertainers but the great leader of the young in heart and mind, leading the youth in service to communities and peoples around the world. Boom! Blown into bits. Bedazzled by drugs and by bad company, our young hero-to-be has been arrested, jailed, dragged into court, lambasted by the press, and threatened with the possibility of deportation from the U. S. What a whirlwind trip!

A petition for deportation that was sent to the White House in January read in part: “We would like to see the dangerous, reckless, destructive, and drug abusing Justin Bieber deported – and his green card revoked. He is not only threatening the safety of our people but he is also a terrible influence on our nation’s youth. We the people would like to remove Justin Bieber from our society.”

Polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans agree Bieber is a bad influence for the country’s young. What a pity! It’s not too late to teach society a lesson here: deport Bieber, drop him from all entertainment shows, and stop buying his records and albums.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Putin’s adventures keep us on edge: after “reclaiming” Crimea from Ukraine, is the Russian leader now planning to take back Alaska?


MapOfAlaskaThe world is sitting on the edge of its seat, figuratively speaking: Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, Russia’s president, is ecstatic over his success is retaking Crimea from Ukraine that some are now thinking he plans to start a move to reclaim Alaska from the United States.

Because the then tsars of the Russian Empire were fearful that they would lose the roughly 586,000 square miles of what was then known as “Russian America” to England in the event of a war with that country, they decided that it was best to convert the territory into cold cash. And so Russia concluded the sale of what is now known as Alaska to the U. S. in 1867 for the now paltry sum $7.2 million in gold. The rest is history: Alaska became the 49th state of the union on January 3, 1959.

At the time of its sale, the Russian Empire was not totally aware of the value of Alaska, strategically and economically – today Vladimir Putin is. And although it is very unlikely that Putin will actually play out the demand for Alaska’s return to Russia, he is nevertheless capable of having such an eerie thought.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment